GMO Discussion Cont'd
In case you have ever wondered about the ongoing experiment on the human population in regards to GMOs in our food supply, here is a journal article about feeding rats GMO seeds and (US allowable amounts of) the matching herbicide laden water. Spoiler alert: rats on this diet had significant life span reductions.
Again for the record Brines Farm doesn't come anywhere close to thinking about planting GMO seeds. Definitely pays to "know your farmer". Remember if you are buying any processed or packaged foods (I know we all do sometimes) that unless you know the purveyor it is best to look for "100% certified organic" since organic (even with the seal) only has to have 95% organic ingredients on processed items and "made with organic ingredients" and "contains organic ingredients" are even less stringent. Forgive me for a sidebar but this also means you are putting all your faith in the entire food chain including certifiers up and down the food chain... so always best to make your own things whenever possible from ingredients you of know.
Again for the record Brines Farm doesn't come anywhere close to thinking about planting GMO seeds. Definitely pays to "know your farmer". Remember if you are buying any processed or packaged foods (I know we all do sometimes) that unless you know the purveyor it is best to look for "100% certified organic" since organic (even with the seal) only has to have 95% organic ingredients on processed items and "made with organic ingredients" and "contains organic ingredients" are even less stringent. Forgive me for a sidebar but this also means you are putting all your faith in the entire food chain including certifiers up and down the food chain... so always best to make your own things whenever possible from ingredients you of know.
Labels: academic


1 Comments:
Interesting, although it is worth noting that this particular paper is widely viewed as scientifically flawed. For example, see:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691512007946
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556617/
It is kind of sad actually. The study was statistically underpowered, and as such makes no arguments of statistical significance. Using the same number of rats (200) and same time line (2 years) they could have easily done a rigorous study, but they chose not to. Sadly too, they are refusing to release their raw data for pos-hoc analysis, citing that in a 2004 Monsanto study, researchers at Monsanto also refused to release their raw data.
The paper does suggest that a properly powered, long term study should be done, but alas, this one does not provide a very compelling result.
By
Peter, At
4/24/2013 10:11:00 AM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home